Where to focus first
Loading the Pareto picture…
ReworkLogic ranks causes, customers, colors, stages, and employees on dollar impact, then surfaces the single bucket that — if fixed — closes the most ground.
Save up to
—
/ year if you fix it
Top causes · by dollar impact
—
Top causes · by frequency
Different from dollars — that's the point
Top customers by remake $
Are they paying for the disruption?
Top colors by remake $
Some patterns / colors quietly compound losses
Repeat-offender patterns
Same cause 3+ in 30 days = systemic
$ impact · last 6 months
Direction matters more than the month
Log a new entry
All entries —
| Date | Type | Job | Customer | Color | Stage caught | Cause | $ Impact |
|---|
Pareto · which causes carry the dollars
Most shops have 20% of causes generating 70–80% of the dollar impact. Fixing the top 2–3 buckets here is worth more than chasing the long tail.
—
Same causes · counted by frequency
Watch for the gap. A cause that's frequent but cheap is process noise. A cause that's rare but expensive is one big install you'll never forget. The ones high on BOTH lists are the dragons.
Where defects originate vs. where they're caught
Each cell shows entries whose root cause originated at the row stage but was caught at the column stage. Cells far from the diagonal cost the most — a template error caught at install means you paid for material, fab, polish, transport, AND install only to redo it.
Concentration:
0
1
2
3–4
5–7
8+
Origin breakdown · where they actually start
Customers · top by $
Repeat = should price in friction
Colors / materials · top by $
Up-charge or stop quoting it
Employees · top by $
Coaching opportunity, not blame
Cross-cut · cause × customer hotspots
Specific patterns repeating
Monthly $ impact · 12 months
—
Top 3 causes · trended monthly
Which causes are improving vs. compounding